Initial Research Task
The opening sequence of this film begins with equilibrium, as
we see a little girl making bracelets, whilst her father works on fixing some
kind of microchip. By starting with equilibrium, we can assume that Todorov's Theory has been applied, and therefore, a disruption will soon occur in the film. (A diagram of this theory is shown below). A sound bridge of diegetic music can be heard, creating a
relaxed mood; the music is an example of parallel sound as it reflects the
relaxed and content mood of the characters. There is also off screen sound of a
lady calling to the man, showing the audience that there is another character
in the house, as well as building the appearance of a happy, ordinary, family
evening. The man wears a plain cream sweatshirt, and the girl’s hair is
perfectly straight, which connotes to us that the man is innocent, the girl is
angelic, and they are both unsuspecting. However, because of the low key
lighting used, the audience connote that when there is a diegetic sound of
someone knocking on the door, something sinister is about to occur. When the
man walks towards the door to open it, a tracking shot from behind is used to
create fear in the audience, who suspect that something terrible is about to
happen. There is also lots of camera shake to suggest danger and make the
audience feel unsettled. The narrative structure is chronological and
restricted, which is very tense for the audience because, like the character, they
don’t know what to expect next. When the man opens the door, he is attacked by
two men who tie him up and begin to steal items from his house. The men wear
dark clothing, which further connotes that they are evil characters. Whereas at
the beginning, steady close up and mid shots were used, this shocking scene
uses a variation of high and low angle shots, varying shot distances and lots
of camera movement to reflect the violence, confusion and fear the characters
are experiencing. A
low angle shot of one of the attackers also connotes that he is in a position
of power here, which makes him seem dangerous and frightening.
Witness To Murder (1954)
This film opens with an establishing extreme long shot of
the night sky, where large dark clouds cover a full moon. This shot uses
pathetic fallacy because full moons are often associated with fear and
violence, which connotes mystery to the viewer. A diegetic crack of thunder
sounds, and then dramatic non diegetic string music begins to pay which
foreshadows a frightening event. The audience can also predict this because of
the movie title, which appears over a high angle extreme long shot of a city,
to contextualise where the movie will take place; they wonder who the murder
witness will be. A dissolve is then used, and the audience see a long shot of
an an empty street, with litter blowing around in the wind which could connote
a rough urban area. This edit suggests to the audience that the location is
within the city- therefore giving us the location of the film. The emptiness of
the setting connotes an eerie, desolate atmosphere which again foreshadows that
a crime may soon be committed. We then cut to a medium close up of a young
woman asleep in her bed. Lighting is used effectively here, as we see strips of
shaking light, as if coming through curtains, across the woman’s face. The
audience can hear the diegetic sound of strong wind, which suggests that the
window is open. These elements of the opening make the audience fear for the
woman, as she seems vulnerable, and we wonder if she could be the victim of the
murder. However, when she gets up to close the window, she sees the murder
taking place in the apartment opposite. An over-shoulder shot is used here, to
show the woman’s point of view as she witnesses the crime. Also, this shot also
allows the audience to be witnesses; therefore throughout the film we will be
on the woman’s side as she tries to catch the killer.
The film begins with an extreme close up of the side of a
taxi as it pulls away, leaving a cloud of exhaust smoke in which the opening
credits appear. After the credits, there is an extreme close up of a man’s eyes,
who we assume to be the taxi driver because of the film title, and the clip of
the car we saw previously. This shot distance suggests to the audience that
this character is important, and by looking closely at his eyes the audience
feel close to him, as if they are there with him in the car. There is non-diegetic
jazz music which could connote a mysterious, sleazy atmosphere to the film, but
also give us clues to the setting- the boroughs of New York City, and the
illicit themes of the movie which include crime and prostitution. The lighting
is low key, as the man is in shadow apart from the red, blue and white lights
that flash occasionally over his face. When the shot dissolves into a point of
view shot through the windscreen, we see that the light sources are neon signs,
connoting an urban setting. There is rain on the windscreen, which is a use of
pathetic fallacy; the audience could connote that the character is lonely and
unhappy in his work, which is suggested by the weather. Long shots of the road
ahead and people on the pavement, linked by dissolves to the extreme close up
of the character, suggest that the man is familiar with the environment and he
often watches the activity in the city at night. The length of the shots, compared to the the close ups
inside the taxi, could also suggest that the man is lonely, and spends most of
his time alone. After watching this opening, the audience don’t know much detail
about the man and his life apart from his profession, which creates mystery
and leaves us wondering who he is, and what the significance of the taxi will be
in the movie.
This is really very good - you really get textual analysis - one of the few who do. The only improvement that you could make in future is to insert grabs at the appropriate point in the text - your text is a bit of a WAL. Maybe some hyperlinks too. But very good Maddie.
ReplyDelete